Capstone: Validate the Decision Design

Review the prepared qualification examples

These eight examples were prepared to illustrate distinct failure classes. They are not evaluated by running your saved policy.

• Complete evidence, no conflicts, nothing estimatedRoute to a seller
  A familiar path does not probe missing, conflicting, or boundary evidence.
• A renewal sitting in one stage for months, behaving normallyScored by the renewal calculation, or blank outside the window
  Exposes a whole population being scored by rules built for a different one.
• Old stage date, genuinely recent meetingThe meeting survives the capped penalty
  Shows how an unbounded term could outweigh a recent meeting in this example formula.
• Required activity date never stampedNot scored, flagged for logging
  Exposes absence being read as a bad signal rather than a missing one.
• Large company, message reads as a testStopped by the interpretive veto
  Exposes rule ordering: cheap numeric rules first would route this.
• Genuine interest far below the scale thresholdKeep and nurture
  Exposes a missing middle outcome.
• Two sources disagree on the deciding fieldReview, both values recorded
  Exposes a decision quietly picking a side.
• The decision never returnsDefined default, marked as defaulted
  Exposes a record stranded behind a gate with no escape.

Run all 12 validation checks

These checks inspect whether the saved sections meet the stated design contract. They do not run the prepared examples through your policy or establish outcome accuracy. Each check has a stable ID and reports pass or fail with a reason.

Approve the current version