gtmjosh

Interactive guide

Make the Decision Without Faking Certainty

A subtle decision-system failure can return an answer that looks plausible even when its evidence or meaning is wrong.

For example, a missing field might be treated as a bad signal rather than an unavailable input. A score of 20 might be read as “a bit unhealthy” even if most of its points come from email activity. A confidence figure of 0.9 might be mistaken for a nine-in-ten chance of being right, though the number may not have been calibrated against outcomes. Each case needs its own evidence and limitations made visible.

You will build a Decision Design: a stated decision shape, explicit rules, a bounded approach to interpretation, clear handling for missing and conflicting evidence, an honest confidence policy, a consistent output shape, and a set of awkward cases to test against a later implementation. The lab saves your progress in this browser.

Work through the evidence with Maya.

Compare rules, scores, and interpretation in the prepared cases. Build a decision design that explains its result and makes missing or conflicting evidence visible.

Maya’s decision workshop. A planning wall, pinned request cards, an open notebook, and a warm wooden worktable.
Maya, decision designer, welcome pose
Maya · Decision designer

Start with a broken answer

Pick the Right Decision Shape

Chapter 1 of 8 · 16 min

Start guide →

The learning path

Every chapter starts from a plausible wrong answer and works backwards to whatever produced it. An empty field read as a bad signal. A score of 20 that means two unrelated things. A confidence figure that measures something other than what the person reading it assumes.

Choosing how the answer gets made

  1. 01Pick the Right Decision ShapeChoose between classifying, scoring, ranking, and recommending, and know what each can and cannot answer.~16 min · exercise
  2. 02Apply Simple Rules FirstDo the deterministic work first, and let one condition short-circuit the rest.~14 min · exercise
  3. 03Use AI Where Interpretation HelpsDraw the line between what a rule can check and what needs reading, and put the model on one side of it.~16 min · exercise
  4. 04Handle Missing and Conflicting EvidenceStop absence being read as a bad signal, and decide which source wins when two disagree.~16 min · exercise

Surviving contact with reality

  1. 05Treat Confidence CarefullySay what a confidence number does and does not mean, and keep a composite score’s parts recoverable.~14 min · exercise
  2. 06Return a Consistent ResultReturn the same shape every time, carrying what the next guide needs to explain it.~14 min · exercise
  3. 07Test Plausible Edge CasesBuild cases from documented failures, near misses, and boundaries; adapt the rules when populations require different evidence.~18 min · exercise
  4. 08Capstone: Validate the Decision DesignReview prepared examples, validate the saved design, and approve only its current version.~20 min · exercise